Når det kommer til computerprocessorer, var 2019 og 2020 de bedste år i lang tid. AMD har forbløffet os med fremragende CPU'er^(CPUs) , der leverer førsteklasses ydeevne, som den 12-kernede Ryzen 9 3900X, den 8-kernede Ryzen 7 3700X eller den 6-kernede Ryzen 5 3600X. Disse processorer rystede markedet med god grund. Nu har AMD lanceret endnu en batch af spændende processorer: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X og Ryzen 3 3100. Disse modeller lover fremragende ydeevne til en pris, der er mere tilgængelig end nogensinde. Se, hvad du får fra AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, i denne anmeldelse:

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X: Hvem er det godt for?

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X er et godt valg, hvis du:

• Er^(Are) interesseret i spil på et budget
• Er^(Are) ved at bygge en pc, der leverer en god samlet ydeevne uden at sprænge banken
• Ønsker PCIe 4^{(Want PCIe 4)} -understøttelse til ultrahurtige SSD - drev og andre komponenter

Fordele og ulemper

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X skinner på mange måder. Her er det, vi bedst kan lide ved denne processor:

• Imponerende single-core ydeevne
• Multicore-ydeevnen er fremragende til produktivitetsopgaver
• Samlet ydeevne er bedre end Intels^(Intel) tilsvarende prissatte processorer
• Den lave pris gør den ideel til budgetvenlige gaming-computere
• Dens lave TDP og beskedne strømbehov gør den fantastisk til energieffektive computere
• Den er ulåst og overclocking er en mulighed
• AMD byder på en Wraith Stealth - køler, mens Intels^(Intel) tilsvarende prissatte processorer kommer uden en køler
• Understøttelse af PCI Express 4 og hurtig DDR4 -hukommelse

Der er også et par ulemper:

• Det har en tendens til at blive ret varmt
• Den frihøjde til overclocking er begrænset af den medfølgende køler

Dom

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X er den bedste budgetvenlige computerprocessor til spil og produktivitet. Den sælges til en meget rimelig pris, og ydeevnen du får er fantastisk. Dette er især bemærkelsesværdigt i apps, der kræver og drager fordel af single-core ydeevne, som spil. Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3300X definerer en ny baseline i budgetydelse, som vi anbefaler til alle.

Hardware specifikationer

Ved lanceringen er Ryzen 3 3300X tilgængelig til en pris på omkring $120. Det er en prisbillig CPU, der bruger Zen 2 - arkitekturen og kommer med alle fordelene ved denne arkitektur, inklusive understøttelse af PCI Express 4 ( PCIe 4 ). For en sammenligning mellem PCIe 4 og PCIe 3 , læs: PCI Express 4 vs PCIe 3: Er der en forbedring af ydeevnen? ^{(PCI Express 4 vs PCIe 3: Is there a performance improvement?)}. Ligesom^(Just) alle de andre processorer fra Ryzen 3000 -serien er 3300X bygget ved hjælp af 7-nanometer fremstillingsprocessen.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X har fire kerner og otte behandlingstråde, clocket til en basisfrekvens på 3,8 GHz . Den maksimale boost-frekvens på en enkeltkerne går op til 4,3 GHz . Denne overkommelige processor har to færre kerner end AMD Ryzen 5 3600 og 3600X , men deres basis- og turbo-ure ligner hinanden. Faktisk har 3300X både et hurtigere basisur (med 200 MHz ) og et turbo-boost-ur (med 100 MHz ) end en Ryzen 5 3600. Sammenlignet med Ryzen 5 3600X er boost-uret, der tilbydes af 3300X, 100 lavere MHz , selvom deres basisure er de samme. ImidlertidAMD Ryzen 3 3300X har også en mindre mængde Level 3 cache-hukommelse: 16 MB vs 32 MB (3600X).

Disse observationer får os til at tro, at Ryzen 3 3300X ligner en Ryzen 5 3600X uden to kerner. Uanset hvad, fordi den er i stand til at opretholde en høj single-core boost-frekvens, ligner Ryzen 3 3300X et glimrende valg for dem, der ønsker at bygge gaming-computere på et budget.

Standard - TDP^{(default TDP)} for Ryzen 3 3300X er kun 65W, og AMD bundter også en Wraith Stealth -lagerkøler med. Det er ikke en deluxe-køler, der mangler RGB - belysning, men den burde gøre sit arbejde godt. I hvert fald^(Anyway) er det bedre end ingenting, hvilket er hvad du får fra Intels^(Intel) processorer til samme pris.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X understøtter hurtig DDR4 RAM , der kører ved 3200 MHz i dual-channel-tilstand, selvom et godt sted for det bedste pris pr. ydeevne-forhold ville være at få dig nogle DDR4 DIMM'er^{(DDR4 DIMMs)} , der kører på 3600 MHz .

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X bruger AM4 -sokkelen og understøtter PCI Express 4 . Det betyder, at selvom det er en budgetprocessor, giver den masser af plads til dem, der i fremtiden ønsker at kunne bruge nye PCIe 4 -grafikkort eller for eksempel SSD'er . ^(SSDs)Ydermere^{(Furthermore)} lancerer AMD også det nye B550 bundkort chipset mens vi snakker, hvilket betyder, at vi snart bør se mainstream bundkort på markedet, med en mere overkommelig pris end eksisterende X570 bundkort.

B550 bundkort vil understøtte Ryzen- processorer bygget på Zen 2 - arkitekturen, såvel som dem, der bruger den næste Zen 3 - arkitektur. Men indtil videre, hvis du ikke har brug for PCI Express 4 , kan du også bruge Ryzen 3 3300X på ældre bundkort med chipsæt som X470 , X370 eller B450 , dog kun med PCI Express 3 .

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X ligner en fremragende computerprocessor. Dens hurtige basisfrekvens og single-core boost-uret burde gøre det i stand til at håndtere selv de nyeste spil, uden at det bliver en flaskehals for dit grafikkort. Lad os se, hvad benchmarkene fortæller os:^{(The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X looks like an excellent computer processor. Its fast base frequency and the single-core boost clock should make it capable of handling even the newest games, without it becoming a bottleneck for your graphics card. Let's see what the benchmarks tell us:)}

Ydeevne i benchmarks og spil

Vi testede AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-processoren på en pc med følgende hardware og software:

• Bundkort: ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi)
• Hukommelse: HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB-hukommelse^{(HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB Memory)} (2 x 8 GB, 3200MHz)
• Grafikkort: ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1660 Ti GAMING OC
• Opbevaring: ADATA XPG Gammix S11 Pro SSD
• Skærm: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ Curved Gaming Monitor (32-tommer WQHD 2560 x 1440, 144Hz)
• Strømforsyningsenhed: ASUS ROG Thor 850W Platinum
• Operativsystem: Windows 10 Pro x64 med opdatering fra november 2019^{( November 2019 Update)}

For at få en bedre idé om ydeevnen, som AMD Ryzen 3 3300X tilbyder, sammenlignede vi dens benchmark-resultater med andre AMD Ryzen- processorer, inklusive den 6-kernede Ryzen 5 3600X , Ryzen 5 3600 og den nyligt lancerede Ryzen 3 3100.

Først benchmarkede vi Ryzen 3 3300X ved hjælp af CPU-Z . I Single Thread fik denne processor en score på 490 point. Det er et fremragende resultat, der viser fremragende single-core ydeevne, hvilket er særligt vigtigt i spil. Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3300X er 2,4 % langsommere end Ryzen 5 3600X, 4,1 % hurtigere end Ryzen 5 3600 og 6,5 % hurtigere end Ryzen 3 3100. Ydermere, ifølge CPU-Z , tilbyder Ryzen 3 3300X den samme ydeevne, som du ville få fra en Intel Core i7-7700K CPU .

I CPU-Z's Multi-Thread-test fik vi en score på 2699. Ryzen 3 3300X har kun fire kerner, så vi forventede, at den ville få et lavere resultat end dens 6-core Ryzen 5 - brødre. Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3300X fik en score, der var 26,2 % lavere end Ryzen 5 3600 og 32,8 % lavere end Ryzen 5 3600X. Sammenlignet med Ryzen 3 3100 er 3300X dog 6,1 % hurtigere i flertrådsdrift. Også ifølge CPU-Z er Ryzen 3 3300X en smule hurtigere (1,9%) end Intel Core i7-7700K-processoren i Multi-Thread benchmark. Det er ret imponerende!

Dernæst gik vi videre til gengivelsesbenchmarks, og vi startede med Cinebench R20 . I multi-thread-testen, som bruger alle processorkernerne, opnåede AMD Ryzen 3^{(AMD Ryzen 3)} 3300X en score på 2355 point. Det er 26,9 % lavere end Ryzen 5 3600X og næsten 33,1 % lavere end Ryzen 5 3600X. Det er normalt, da denne test bruger alle processorkernerne, og mens 3600 og 3600X har seks kerner hver, har 3300X kun fire. På den anden side var 3300X 7,9 % hurtigere end den billigere Ryzen 3 3100, som også har fire kerner.

I Blender Benchmark gengav vi to forskellige scener (bmw27 og klasseværelset). Dette benchmark måler den tid, computeren skal bruge til at fuldføre gengivelsen af ​​scenerne. Hvis en processor har brug for mindre tid end andre, betyder det, at den er hurtigere. Fordi den har færre kerner end de andre CPU'er^(CPUs) på listen, havde AMD Ryzen 3 3300X brug for 23,8 minutter for at blive færdig. I procenter var den 4 % langsommere end Ryzen 5 3600 og 6,85 % langsommere end Ryzen 5 3600X. Den var dog også 9,9 % hurtigere end Ryzen 3 3100-processoren.

7-Zip er en app til at komprimere filer, og også en god måde at måle multi-tråds ydeevne af processorer. Ved at bruge AMD Ryzen 3 3300X målte vi en kompressionshastighed på 29 MB/s , hvilket er 27,5 % mindre end hvad du får fra en Ryzen 5 3600 eller Ryzen 5 3600X. Det er et fremragende resultat i betragtning af, at 3300X kun har fire kerner, mens de to andre har seks kerner. Sammenlignet med Ryzen 3 3100 var 3300X 10,35 % hurtigere.

Dekompressionshastigheden i 7-Zip var 497 MB/s , mindre end hvad du får fra Ryzen 5- processorer, som har to kerner mere (30,2 % langsommere end 3600 og 34,6 % langsommere end 3600X). 3300X er også 6,64 % hurtigere end en AMD Ryzen 3 3100-processor.

Dernæst gik vi videre til at måle processorens ydeevne i daglige aktiviteter ved hjælp af PCMark 10 . Dette benchmark evaluerer computerens hastighed inden for områder som web-browsing, videokonferencer, opstartstider for apps, produktivitet og oprettelse af digitalt indhold. Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3300X imponerede os. Selvom den har to kerner mindre end Ryzen 5 3600, fik den en score, der er 4,45 % bedre, sandsynligvis på grund af dens lidt højere boost-ure. Sammenlignet med 3600X var 3300X's score 4,52 % lavere, og sammenlignet med Ryzen 3 3100 var 3300X 5,8 % bedre. Alt i alt viser dette, at AMD Ryzen 3 3300X er et fremragende valg for produktivitet også, ikke kun til spil.

Dernæst tjekkede vi, hvor god AMD Ryzen 3 3300X er, når man surfer på internettet. For at måle dens ydeevne brugte vi JetStream 2 benchmark i Google Chrome . Jo højere score, jo hurtigere er processoren. Vi fik en overraskelse, da vi så, at Ryzen 3 3300X er lige så hurtig som Ryzen 5 3600X. Det er faktisk hurtigere end alle de andre på vores liste. Den mest tydelige uoverensstemmelse er mod Ryzen 3 3100, som er 10,8 % langsommere end 3300X. Dette resultat er en konsekvens af den fremragende single-core ydeevne, der tilbydes af AMD Ryzen 3 3300X.

Når det kommer til computerprocessorer, er spilydelse for mange et væsentligt aspekt. De næste benchmarks, vi kørte, er rettet til spillere. For at undgå eventuelle flaskehalse konfigurerede vi spillene til at bruge 1080p-opløsninger og de laveste indstillinger for grafikkvalitet.

I Shadow of the Tomb Raider fik AMD Ryzen 3 3300X en CPU Render- score på 191 billeder i sekundet. Det er 15,19 % mere end hvad Ryzen 3 3100 kan levere. Selvom det er mindre end hvad en Ryzen 5 3600 eller en 3600X kan gøre, er dette resultat imponerende. Sandsynligvis takket være dens single-core ydeevne kan du bruge 3300X til at køre ethvert spil, inklusive dem, der blev lanceret i 2020, med højkvalitetsindstillinger og FHD - opløsninger, hvis dit grafikkort ikke er en flaskehals for din computers ydeevne.

I Metro Exodus , som er et af de mest krævende spil, vi har spillet, både hvad angår video- og processorydelse, leverede AMD Ryzen 3 3300X en gennemsnitlig billedhastighed på 109. Det er kun 4,39 % mindre, end hvad vi fik fra AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, og det er den samme fps, som vi målte med AMD Ryzen 3600 . Ser man på Ryzen 3 3100's billedhastighed, var 3300X i stand til at gengive 3,77 % flere fps.

I World War Z , som er et spil optimeret til multi-threading, målte vi 175 fps. Det er mindre end hvad de sekskernede Ryzen 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600X- og 3600-processorer kan (henholdsvis 16,27 % og 10,26 % færre fps), men 11,43 % mere end hvad den mere overkommelige Ryzen 3 3100 CPU tilbyder. Ryzen 3 3300X formår også at tilbyde fremragende ydeevne i dette spil, hvilket bekræfter, at det er et godt køb for enhver budget gaming computer.

For at teste temperaturerne nået af AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, kørte vi Prime95 for at understrege det, og vi overvågede det med Open Hardware Monitor . Desværre modtog vi denne processor uden dens lagerkøler. Derfor var vi nødt til at bruge en anden køler: en ASUS ROG Ryuo 120 . Det er en mere kraftfuld og effektiv køler end den almindelige Wraith Stealth , som du får med Ryzen 3 3300X. Bemærk, at vi målte temperaturerne på de andre processorer i diagrammet ved hjælp af deres lagerkølere, så se på følgende resultater med nogle forbehold.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X -processoren nåede nogle ret høje temperaturer og blev så varm som 93 grader Celsius (199 grader Fahrenheit ). Det er ret meget, og med den almindelige Wraith Stealth - køler kommer 3300X sandsynligvis til at skrue ned fra tid til anden i krævende spil eller apps.

Derefter målte vi strømforbruget for AMD Ryzen 3 3300X. Det maksimale vi har set var på 78 watt, hvilket ikke er meget i betragtning af dets 4,3 GHz boost-ur. Bemærk, at denne værdi gælder for krævende use cases. I almindeligt kontorarbejde og de fleste spil bør mængden af ​​forbrugt elektricitet være lavere.

Ydeevnen, der tilbydes af AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, er fremragende, i betragtning af hvor overkommelig denne processor er. Lige nu mener vi, at dette er den bedste budgetcomputerprocessor på markedet, især til spil, men også til produktivitet.^{(The performance offered by the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is excellent, considering how affordable this processor is. Right now, we believe this is the best budget computer processor on the market, especially for gaming, but also for productivity.)}

Hvad er din mening om AMD Ryzen 3 3300X?

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X viste sig at være en imponerende lille fyr! 🙂 Det er den bedste prisbillige desktopprocessor i årevis, og alle, der bygger en computer på et budget, bør overveje det. Inden du lukker denne anmeldelse, skal du fortælle os din mening om denne CPU . Kan du lide de resultater, du har set i vores benchmarks? Kommenter^(Comment) nedenfor og lad os diskutere.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X review: The new king of budget gaming!

When it comes tо computer prоcessors, 2019 and 2020 were the best years in a long time. AMD has аmazed us with excellent CPUs that deliver top-notch performаnce, like thе 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X, the 8-core Ryzen 7 3700X, or the 6-core Ryzen 5 3600X. These procеssors rocked the market for gоod reason. Now, AMD has launched anothеr batch of exciting procеѕsors: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 3 3100. These models promise excellent performance, at a price рoint that is more accessible than ever. See what you get from thе AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, in this reviеw:

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X: Who is it good for?

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is a great choice if you:

• Are interested in gaming on a budget
• Are building a PC that delivers good overall performance without breaking the bank
• Want PCIe 4 support for ultra-fast SSD drives, and other components

Pros and cons

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X shines in many ways. Here is what we like most about this processor:

• Impressive single-core performance
• The multicore performance is excellent for productivity tasks
• Overall performance is better than Intel's similarly priced processors
• The low price makes it ideal for budget-friendly gaming computers
• Its low TDP and modest power needs make it great for energy-efficient computers
• It is unlocked and overclocking is an option
• AMD bundles a Wraith Stealth cooler while Intel's similarly priced processors come without a cooler
• Support for PCI Express 4 and fast DDR4 memory

There are a few downsides as well:

• It tends to get quite hot
• The headroom left for overclocking is limited by the bundled cooler

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is the best budget-friendly computer processor for gaming, and productivity. It's sold at a very reasonable price, and the performance you get is fantastic. This is especially noticeable in apps that require and benefit from the single-core performance, like games. The Ryzen 3 3300X is defining a new baseline in budget performance that we recommend to anyone.

Hardware specifications

At launch, the Ryzen 3 3300X is available at a price of about $120. It is an affordable CPU that uses the Zen 2 architecture and comes with all the benefits of this architecture, including support for PCI Express 4 (PCIe 4). For a comparison between PCIe 4 and PCIe 3, read: PCI Express 4 vs PCIe 3: Is there a performance improvement?. Just like all the other processors from the Ryzen 3000 series, the 3300X is built using the 7-nanometer manufacturing process.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has four cores and eight processing threads, clocked at a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. The maximum boost frequency, on a single-core, goes up to 4.3 GHz. This affordable processor has two fewer cores than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and 3600X, but their base and turbo clocks are similar. In fact, the 3300X has both a faster base clock (by 200 MHz) and a turbo boost clock (by 100 MHz) than a Ryzen 5 3600. Compared to the Ryzen 5 3600X, the boost clock offered by the 3300X is lower by 100 MHz, although their base clocks are the same. However, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X also has a lesser amount of Level 3 cache memory: 16 MB vs 32 MB (3600X).

These observations make us think that the Ryzen 3 3300X looks like a Ryzen 5 3600X stripped of two cores. Either way, because it's able to sustain a high single-core boost frequency, the Ryzen 3 3300X looks like an excellent choice for those who want to build gaming computers on a budget.

The default TDP of the Ryzen 3 3300X is a mere 65W, and AMD also bundles a Wraith Stealth stock cooler with it. It is not a deluxe cooler, lacking RGB lighting, but it should do its job well. Anyway, it's better than nothing, which is what you get from Intel's similarly priced processors.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X supports fast DDR4 RAM running at 3200 MHz in dual-channel mode, although a sweet spot for the best price per performance ratio would be getting yourself some DDR4 DIMMs running at 3600 MHz.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X uses the AM4 socket and supports PCI Express 4. That means that, even if it is a budget processor, it provides plenty of headroom for those who, in the future, want to be able to use new PCIe 4 graphics cards, or SSDs for instance. Furthermore, AMD is also launching the new B550 motherboard chipset as we speak, which means that we should soon see mainstream motherboards on the market, with a more affordable price than existing X570 motherboards.

B550 motherboards are going to support Ryzen processors built on the Zen 2 architecture, as well as the ones using the next Zen 3 architecture. However, for now, if you don't need PCI Express 4, you can also use the Ryzen 3 3300X on older motherboards with chipsets such as X470, X370, or B450, albeit only with PCI Express 3.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X looks like an excellent computer processor. Its fast base frequency and the single-core boost clock should make it capable of handling even the newest games, without it becoming a bottleneck for your graphics card. Let's see what the benchmarks tell us:

Performance in benchmarks and games

We tested the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X processor on a PC with the following hardware and software:

• Motherboard: ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi)
• Memory: HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB Memory (2 x 8GB, 3200MHz)
• Graphics Card: ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1660 Ti GAMING OC
• Storage: ADATA XPG Gammix S11 Pro SSD
• Monitor: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ Curved Gaming Monitor (32-inch WQHD 2560 x 1440, 144Hz)
• Power Supply Unit: ASUS ROG Thor 850W Platinum
• Operating System: Windows 10 Pro x64 with November 2019 Update

To get a better idea about the performance offered by the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, we compared its benchmarks results with other AMD Ryzen processors, including the 6-core Ryzen 5 3600X, the Ryzen 5 3600, and the recently launched Ryzen 3 3100.

First, we benchmarked the Ryzen 3 3300X using CPU-Z. In the Single Thread, this processor got a score of 490 points. It's an outstanding result that shows excellent single-core performance, which is especially important in gaming. The Ryzen 3 3300X is 2.4% slower than the Ryzen 5 3600X, 4.1% faster than Ryzen 5 3600, and 6.5% faster than the Ryzen 3 3100. Furthermore, according to CPU-Z, the Ryzen 3 3300X offers the same performance you would get from an Intel Core i7-7700K CPU.

In CPU-Z's Multi-Thread test, we got a score of 2699. The Ryzen 3 3300X has only four cores, so we expected it to get a lower result than its 6-core Ryzen 5 brothers. The Ryzen 3 3300X got a score that was 26.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 3600 and 32.8% lower than that of the Ryzen 5 3600X. However, compared to the Ryzen 3 3100, the 3300X is 6.1% faster in multithreaded operations. Also, according to CPU-Z, the Ryzen 3 3300X is a bit faster (1.9%) than the Intel Core i7-7700K processor in the Multi-Thread benchmark. That's quite impressive!

Next, we moved on to the rendering benchmarks, and we started with Cinebench R20. In the multi-thread test, which uses all the processor cores, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X managed a score of 2355 points. It's 26.9% lower than that of the Ryzen 5 3600X, and almost 33.1% lower than the Ryzen 5 3600X. That's normal, as this test uses all the processor cores and, while the 3600 and 3600X have six cores each, the 3300X has only four. On the other hand, the 3300X was 7.9% faster than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100, which also has four cores.

In Blender Benchmark, we rendered two different scenes (bmw27 and classroom). This benchmark measures the time needed by the computer to complete the rendering of the scenes. If a processor needs less time than others, it means that it is faster. Because it has fewer cores than the other CPUs in the list, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X needed 23.8 minutes to finish. In percentages, it was 4% slower than the Ryzen 5 3600, and 6.85% slower than the Ryzen 5 3600X. However, it was also 9.9% faster than the Ryzen 3 3100 processor.

7-Zip is an app for compressing files, and also a good way of measuring the multi-thread performance of processors. Using the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, we measured a compression speed of 29 MB/s, which is 27.5% less than what you get from a Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 3600X. It is an excellent result considering that the 3300X has only four cores, while the other two have six cores. Compared to the Ryzen 3 3100, the 3300X was 10.35% faster.

The decompression speed in 7-Zip was 497 MB/s, less than what you get from Ryzen 5 processors, which have two cores more (30.2% slower than the 3600, and 34.6% slower than the 3600X). The 3300X is also 6.64% faster than an AMD Ryzen 3 3100 processor.

Next, we moved on to measure the performance of the processor in daily activities, using PCMark 10. This benchmark evaluates the computer's speed in areas such as web browsing, video conferencing, apps start-up times, productivity, and digital content creation. The Ryzen 3 3300X impressed us. Although it has two cores less than the Ryzen 5 3600, it got a score that is 4.45% better, probably because of its slightly higher boost clocks. Compared to the 3600X, 3300X's score was 4.52% lower, and, compared to the Ryzen 3 3100, the 3300X was 5.8% better. All in all, this shows that the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is an excellent choice for productivity also, not just for gaming.

Next, we checked how good the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is when surfing on the internet. To measure its performance, we used the JetStream 2 benchmark in Google Chrome. The higher score, the faster the processor. We were in for a surprise when we saw that the Ryzen 3 3300X is just as fast as the Ryzen 5 3600X. It's actually faster than all the others on our list. The most evident discrepancy is against the Ryzen 3 3100, which is 10.8% slower than the 3300X. This result is a consequence of the excellent single-core performance offered by the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X.

When it comes to computer processors, for many, gaming performance is an essential aspect. The next benchmarks that we ran are addressed to gamers. To avoid any possible bottlenecks, we configured the games to use 1080p resolutions and the lowest graphics quality settings.

In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X got a CPU Render score of 191 frames per second. It's 15.19% more than what the Ryzen 3 3100 can deliver. Although it's less than what a Ryzen 5 3600 or a 3600X can do, this result is impressive. Probably thanks to its single-core performance, you can use the 3300X to run any game, including those launched in 2020, at high-quality settings and FHD resolutions, if your graphics card doesn't bottleneck your computer's performance.

In Metro Exodus, which is one of the most demanding games we've played, both in terms of video and processor performance, AMD Ryzen 3 3300X delivered an average frame rate of 109. That is only 4.39% less than what we got from the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, and it is the same fps we measured with the AMD Ryzen 3600. Looking at Ryzen 3 3100's frame rate, the 3300X was able to render 3.77% more fps.

In World War Z, which is a game optimized for multi-threading, we measured 175 fps. That's less than what the six-core Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 processors can do (16.27% and 10.26% fewer fps, respectively), but 11.43% more than what the more affordable Ryzen 3 3100 CPU offers. Ryzen 3 3300X manages to offer excellent performance in this game too, confirming that it is a great buy for any budget gaming computer.

To test the temperatures reached by the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, we ran Prime95 to stress it, and we monitored it with Open Hardware Monitor. Unfortunately we received this processor without its stock cooler. That's why we had to use a different cooler: an ASUS ROG Ryuo 120. It is a more powerful and efficient cooler than the stock Wraith Stealth that you get with the Ryzen 3 3300X. Note that we measured the temperatures of the other processors in the chart using their stock coolers, so look at the following results with some reservations.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X processor reached some rather high temperatures, getting as hot as 93 degrees Celsius (199 degrees Fahrenheit). It's quite a lot and, with the stock Wraith Stealth cooler, the 3300X is probably going to throttle from time to time, in demanding games or apps.

Then, we measured the power consumption of the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X. The maximum we've seen was of 78 watts, which is not a lot considering its 4.3GHz boost clock. Note that this value applies to demanding use cases. In regular office work and most games, the amount of electricity consumed should be lower.

The performance offered by the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is excellent, considering how affordable this processor is. Right now, we believe this is the best budget computer processor on the market, especially for gaming, but also for productivity.

What is your opinion about the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X?

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X proved to be an impressive little fellow! 🙂 It is the best affordable desktop processor in years, and everyone building a computer on a budget should consider it. Before closing this review, tell us your opinion about this CPU. Do you like the results you've seen in our benchmarks? Comment below and let's discuss.

Related posts

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X overclocket ved 4,8 GHz: Er det det værd? -

• AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-processoranmeldelse: 2019's bedste mellemklassevalg!

• Gennemgå AMD Ryzen 3 3100: Omdefinerer budgetvenlig

• Overclocking af AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: Hvad får du, og hvad mister du? -

• Ydeevnesammenligning: Brug af AMD Ryzen 5 3600X på X570 vs. X470 bundkort

• Intel Core 12th Gen i7-12700K anmeldelse: Tilbage i spillet!

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X anmeldelse: Den bedste mellemklasse desktopprocessor til spil? -

• Hvilken model er min Windows 10 pc, bærbare computer eller tablet? 8 måder at finde ud af -

• Gennemgang af AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-processoren: fantastisk til spil!

• ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AWP anmeldelse: En funktionsrig bærbar skærm

• Intel Core i5-12600K anmeldelse: Årets bedste mellemklasse-gaming-CPU?

• ASUS Mini PC PN62 anmeldelse: En mini PC, der passer i din hånd!

• AMD Zen 3 og Ryzen 5000 processorer kommer (specifikationer, priser, udgivelsesdato)

• AMD vs. INTEL i 2022: Hvilke CPU'er er bedre?

• PCI Express 4 vs PCIe 3: Er der en forbedring af ydeevnen?

• Sådan tester du din RAM med Windows Memory Diagnostic-værktøjet -

• Gennemgå LG Gram 16: Mesteren i divisionen for ultralette bærbare computere

• Sådan indtaster du BIOS i Windows 10

• 8 måder at justere lysstyrken i Windows 11 -

• Hvor finder jeg Windows 10-opdateringshastigheden? Hvordan ændres det?