Alle routerproducenter har migreret mod Wi-Fi 6- standarden, og markedet er fyldt med nye routere, der angiver Wi-Fi 6- understøttelse som deres hovedfunktion. Hvis du vil opgradere dit hjemmenetværk, anbefaler både TP-Link og andre producenter at købe en router med Wi-Fi 6 . Årsagen er, at disse modeller har en tendens til at tilbyde højere hastigheder og ny hardware, der bedre kan håndtere et hjemmenetværk med et stadigt stigende antal enheder. Det lyder godt i teorien, men hvordan er tingene i det virkelige liv? Hvilke hastighedsfordele får du, når du køber en TP-Link- router med Wi-Fi 6 ? Læs vores analyse og find ud af:

Testproceduren og de TP-Link-routere, vi brugte

Wi-Fi 6 er en ny standard for trådløse netværk, der inkluderer mange innovative teknologier, som gør det muligt at tilbyde hurtigere netværk, et bredere dækningsområde og styring af et større antal tilsluttede enheder. Også routere med Wi-Fi 6 kan tilbyde øget sikkerhed gennem WPA3 - en ny krypteringsstandard, der kun er tilgængelig på routere med Wi-Fi 6 , samt mindre strømforbrug. For at gøre vores analyse om Wi-Fi 6 så relevant som muligt for de fleste hjemmebrugere, tog vi to TP-Link-routere med understøttelse af denne standard:

• TP-Link Archer AX10 - TP-Links Wi-Fi 6-router med den mest tilgængelige pris, så mange mennesker har råd til at købe den. I vores anmeldelse vurderede vi den som en af ​​de bedste budgetmodeller på markedet. Archer AX10 er en dual-band router med solid hardware (tre-core Broadcom - processor, 256 MB RAM ), som kun giver adgang til Wi-F 6 på 5 GHz - båndet. På 2,4 GHz -båndet kan denne router bruge Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)-standarden, ikke Wi-Fi 6.
• TP-Link Archer AX50 - koster lidt mere, men den giver adgang til Wi-Fi 6 på begge dets bånd: 2,4 GHz og 5 GHz . En anden vigtig funktion er dens mere avancerede firmware, som inkluderer nyttige funktioner såsom cloud-baseret antivirus og forældrekontrol, en USB 3.0 -port og en Intel -processor med to-kerner i stedet for en Broadcom - processor.

Begge routere er rimelige og repræsenterer ikke dyre indkøb. Det ville have været nemt for os at bede TP-Link om at sende en dyr model som Archer AX6000 og vise, hvordan en premium router kan udkonkurrere ældre routere, der bruger de ældre standarder. Men ville det have været realistisk og nyttigt for dig og andre brugere, der kun vil købe routere til rimelige priser?

Fordi vi ikke ønsker, at vores analyse skal være for lang og trættende, besluttede vi at lave de samme sæt målinger på begge routere i de følgende tre rum fra vores testlejlighed, som har et fodaftryk på cirka 80 kvadratmeter eller 861 kvadratfod :

• Stue^{(Living room)} - rummet hvor routeren er placeret og hvor det er nemt at nå den maksimale hastighed hver router er i stand til.
• Stort soveværelse^{(Big bedroom)} - et rum adskilt fra routeren af ​​en væg, der reducerer både signalstyrken og hastigheden. I enhver lejlighed, uanset hvor omhyggeligt du placerer en router, vil de fleste rum være adskilt fra routeren af ​​en væg. Det er derfor, for de fleste mennesker, at målingerne i dette rum vil være de mest relevante for en routers ydeevne i det virkelige liv.
• Køkken^(Kitchen) - dette rum er relativt langt fra routeren, placeret i en vinkel, der er lidt svær at dække af alle routere. I dette rum har de fleste trådløse routere, som vi tester, problemer med både signalstyrken og den maksimale hastighed, de leverer. Dette rum hjælper dig med at finde ud af, hvordan en router har tendens til at præstere i et område, hvor det er udfordrende at levere solid signalstyrke.

Lejligheden og værelserne, hvor vi lavede vores mål

De test, vi brugte til at sammenligne de hastigheder, du får, når du bruger Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 vs. Wi-Fi 4, er følgende:

• SpeedTest - fortæller os den maksimale hastighed, du kan opnå, når du gennemser eller downloader indhold fra internettet via det trådløse netværk, der administreres af din router.
• PassMark Performance test - fortæller os den gennemsnitlige hastighed, du får, når du overfører data gennem dit netværk. Det er relevant, når du vil kopiere filer fra en enhed til en anden inde på dit netværk, eller når du streamer medier mellem dine netværksenheder. For Netflix eller HBO Go er SpeedTest mere pålidelig end PassMark Performance-testen^{(PassMark Performance test)} .

Nok intro, lad os se de resultater, vi havde:

TP-Link Archer AX10 : Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 vs. Wi-Fi 4

Den første router, som vi testede i vores analyse, er TP-Link Archer AX10 - et glimrende valg for folk med et beskedent budget. Lad^(First) os først se den maksimale downloadhastighed opnået med SpeedTest i alle tre rum ved hjælp af de tre standarder:

• Wi-Fi 4 på 2,4 GHz-båndet
• Wi-Fi 5 og Wi-Fi 6 på 5 GHz - båndet

Som du kan se nedenfor, i Stuen^{(Living room)} , hvor det er nemt at opnå den maksimale tilgængelige hastighed for hver trådløs standard, var Wi-Fi 6 vinderen med stor margin. Vi målte en topdownloadhastighed på 720,76 Mbps (absolut fremragende selv for krævende brugere): den var 16,2 % højere end den maksimale hastighed nået med Wi-Fi 5 og 237 % højere end Wi-Fi 4. I køkkenet^(Kitchen) , hvor alle routere har det "svært", tilbød Wi-Fi 6- standarden en downloadhastighed, der var 20 % højere end Wi-Fi 5 og 287 % højere end Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Downloadhastighed^(Download) i SpeedTest

Lad os se sammenligningen for uploadhastigheden, det er nyttigt, når du vil uploade filer over internettet. Wi-Fi 6 tilbød bedre hastigheder end de andre standarder i alle værelser undtagen køkkenet^(Kitchen) .

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Uploadhastighed^(Upload) i SpeedTest

PassMark Performance test fortæller os den gennemsnitlige hastighed for netværksoverførsler. Her var forskellene til fordel for Wi-Fi 6 endnu mere markante. For eksempel var Wi-Fi 6 36 % hurtigere i stuen^(Living) end Wi-Fi 5 og 312 % hurtigere end Wi-Fi 4. I køkkenet^(Kitchen) , rummet med det svageste signal, var Wi-Fi 6 29 % hurtigere end Wi-Fi 5 og 82 % hurtigere end Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Downloadhastighed^(Download) på Wi-Fi

Da vi målte uploadhastigheden, forblev Wi-Fi 6 hastighedsmesteren i alle rum.

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Uploadhastighed^(Upload) på Wi-Fi

Vores sammenligning viser, at Wi-Fi 6 tilbyder betydelige hastighedsforbedringer, selv når du køber en mere overkommelig router, som TP-Link Archer AX10 . Der er ingen grund til at investere mange penge for at drage fordel af Wi-Fi 6 og hvad det har at tilbyde.

TP-Link Archer AX50 : Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 og Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 4

TP-Link Archer AX50 er en model, der kan bruge Wi-Fi 6 på begge bånd: 2,4 GHz og 5 GHz . På denne router lavede vi de samme tests som tidligere, men vi grupperede dem forskelligt: ​​Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 4 på 2,4 GHz -båndet og Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 på 5 GHz - båndet. Resultaterne, vi målte, er mere afbalancerede mellem Wi-Fi 4 og Wi-Fi 6, fordi de bruger det samme trådløse bånd denne gang.

Vi analyserede først 2,4 GHz -båndet og sammenlignede hastighederne tilbudt af Archer AX50 ved hjælp af Wi-Fi 4- og Wi-Fi 6-standarderne. Downloadhastigheden nået på Wi-Fi 6 i stuen^{(Living room)} (rummet med de højeste hastigheder generelt) var 161,31 Mbps - 48 % højere end ved brug af Wi-Fi 4. I grafikken herunder ser du også de forskelle, som vi målt i de øvrige rum. Det er let at bemærke, at Wi-Fi 6 konstant var hurtigere end Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Downloadhastighed^(Download) i SpeedTest

Det samme skete med de uploadhastigheder, vi målte i SpeedTest . Der var nogle væsentlige forskelle. For eksempel i stuen^{(Living room)} var Wi-Fi 6 106 % hurtigere end Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Uploadhastighed^(Upload) i SpeedTest

Vi målte den gennemsnitlige hastighed for netværksoverførsler på 2,4 GHz -båndet med PassMark Performance-testen^{(PassMark Performance test)} . I denne test var forskellene mindre end i SpeedTest , men selv her formåede Wi-Fi 6 at være væsentligt hurtigere end Wi-Fi 4 i alle rum.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Downloadhastighed^(Download) på Wi-Fi

Når man så på uploadhastigheden, var forskellene mere små mellem de to standarder, men Wi-Fi 6 vandt stadig.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Uploadhastighed^(Upload) på Wi-Fi

As you could see for yourself, the Wi-Fi 6 standard offered significantly improvements in speed compared to Wi-Fi 4 on the 2.4 GHz band. Sometimes, the differences rose to 106% in favor of Wi-Fi 6.

I stuen^{(Living room)} , med SpeedTest , var downloadhastigheden tilbudt af Archer AX50 gennem Wi-Fi 6- standarden 30 % højere end gennem Wi-Fi 5. I det store soveværelse^{(Big bedroom)} var rummet adskilt fra routeren med én væg, forskellen var 65 % til fordel for Wi-Fi 6.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Downloadhastighed^(Download) i SpeedTest

Ved måling af uploadhastigheden var situationen mere afbalanceret mellem de to standarder, men Wi-Fi 6 var stadig vinderen.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Uploadhastighed^(Upload) i SpeedTest

PassMark Performance test har vist betydelige forskelle i alle rum, når det kommer til den gennemsnitlige downloadhastighed gennem det trådløse netværk. I stuen^{(Living room)} var Wi-Fi 6- standarden 15 % hurtigere end Wi-Fi 5, mens Wi-Fi 6 var 38,7 % hurtigere end Wi-Fi 5 i køkkenet^(Kitchen) (det rum, hvor de fleste routere har problemer).

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Downloadhastighed^(Download) på Wi-Fi

Ved måling af den gennemsnitlige uploadhastighed var Wi-Fi 6 den klare vinder. For eksempel i stuen^{(Living room)} var uploadhastigheden 24 % hurtigere gennem Wi-Fi 6 end gennem Wi-Fi 5.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Uploadhastighed^(Upload) på Wi-Fi

On the 5 GHz band, Wi-Fi 6 was the winning standard, and it sometimes outperformed Wi-Fi 5 with differences of up to 65%.

Hvilken TP-Link Archer- router med Wi-Fi 6 foretrækker du?

Som du kan se, er der betydelige forskelle i hastigheden, når man ser på nye TP-Link Archer- routere med Wi-Fi 6. De nye modeller har rimelige priser, som mange har råd til. De pakker også opdateret hardware, som opfylder behovene i et moderne hjemmenetværk, hvor onlinespil, Full HD -videokonferencer og videostreaming i 4K-opløsninger^{(4K resolutions)} er normen. Selv en prisbillig model som TP-Link Archer AX10 har en trekernet Broadcom - processor, der kører på 1,5 GHz , og som kan håndtere et betydeligt antal netværksenheder. Hvis du vil se, hvordan de routere, vi nævnte, er prissat, så tag et kig på Amazon: TP-Link Archer AX10 ,TP-Link Archer AX50 , og TP-Link Archer AX6000 , Inden du lukker, så lad os også vide, hvad du synes om vores analyse og de hastigheder, vi nåede, og fortæl os, hvilken Wi-Fi 6- router du foretrækker.

Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 vs. Wi-Fi 4 on TP-Link routers -

All routеr manufacturers haνe migrated towards the Wi-Fі 6 standard, and the market is filled with new rоuters that list Wi-Fi 6 ѕupport as their main feature. If you want to upgrade your home network, both TP-Link and other manufacturers recommend buying a routеr with Wi-Fi 6. The reаson is these models tend to offer higher speeds and new hardware that can better handle a home network with an ever-increasing number of devices. This sounds great in theorу, but how are things in real life? What ѕpeed advantages do you get when buying a TP-Link router with Wi-Fi 6? Read our analysis and find оut:

The testing procedure and the TP-Link routers we used

Wi-Fi 6 is a new standard for wireless networks that includes many innovative technologies which allow it to offer faster networks, a wider coverage area, and the management of a higher number of connected devices. Also, routers with Wi-Fi 6 can offer increased security through WPA3 - a new encryption standard that is available only on routers with Wi-Fi 6, as well as less power consumption. To make our analysis about Wi-Fi 6 as relevant as possible for most home users, we took two TP-Link routers with support for this standard:

• TP-Link Archer AX10 - TP-Link’s Wi-Fi 6 router with the most accessible price, so many people can afford to buy it. In our review, we rated it as one of the best budget models on the market. Archer AX10 is a dual-band router with solid hardware (three-core Broadcom processor, 256 MB of RAM), which offers access to Wi-F 6 only on the 5 GHz band. On the 2.4 GHz band, this router can use the Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) standard, not Wi-Fi 6.
• TP-Link Archer AX50 - costs a little more, but it offers access to Wi-Fi 6 on both its bands: 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. Another important feature is its more advanced firmware, which includes useful features such as cloud-based antivirus and parental controls, a USB 3.0 port, and an Intel processor with two-cores instead of a Broadcom processor.

Both routers are reasonably priced and don’t represent expensive purchases. It would have been easy for us to ask TP-Link to send a costly model like Archer AX6000 and show how a premium router can outperform older routers that use the older standards. However, would that have been realistic and useful to you and other users who are going to buy only reasonably priced routers?

Because we don’t want our analysis to be too long and tedious, we decided to make the same sets of measurements on both routers in the following three rooms from our test apartment, which has a footprint of approximately 80 square meters or 861 square feet:

• Living room - the room where the router is placed and where it is easy to reach the maximum speed each router is capable of.
• Big bedroom - a room separated from the router by one wall that reduces both the signal strength and the speed. In any apartment, no matter how carefully you place a router, most rooms are going to be separated from the router by one wall. This is why, for the majority of people, the measurements made in this room are going to be the most relevant for a router’s real-life performance.
• Kitchen - this room is relatively far from the router, situated at an angle that is a bit difficult to cover by all routers. In this room, most wireless routers that we test have issues with both the signal strength and the maximum speed that they deliver. This room helps you figure out how a router tends to perform in an area where it is challenging to provide solid signal strength.

The apartament and the rooms where we made our measurements

The tests we used to compare the speeds you get when using Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 vs. Wi-Fi 4 are the following:

• SpeedTest - tells us the maximum speed you can achieve when you browse or download content from the internet through the wireless network managed by your router.
• PassMark Performance test - tells us the average speed you get when transferring data through your network. It is relevant when you want to copy files from one device to another inside your network or when streaming media between your network devices. For Netflix or HBO Go, SpeedTest is more reliable than the PassMark Performance test.

Enough intro, let’s see the results we had:

TP-Link Archer AX10: Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 vs. Wi-Fi 4

The first router that we tested in our analysis is TP-Link Archer AX10 - an excellent choice for people with a modest budget. First, let’s see that maximum download speed achieved with SpeedTest in all three rooms, using the three standards:

• Wi-Fi 4 on the 2.4 GHz band
• Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 6 on the 5 GHz band

As you can see below, in the Living room, where it is easy to achieve the maximum speed available for each wireless standard, Wi-Fi 6 was the winner by a large margin. We measured a top download speed of 720.76 Mbps (absolutely excellent even for demanding users): it was 16.2% higher than the maximum speed reached with Wi-Fi 5 and 237% higher than Wi-Fi 4. In the Kitchen, where all routers have a “hard time,” the Wi-Fi 6 standard offered a download speed that was 20% higher than Wi-Fi 5 and 287% higher than Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Download speed in SpeedTest

Let’s see the comparison for the upload speed, that’s useful when you want to upload files over the internet. Wi-Fi 6 offered better speeds than the other standards in all rooms but the Kitchen.

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Upload speed in SpeedTest

PassMark Performance test tells us the average speed for network transfers. Here, the differences in favor of Wi-Fi 6 were even more significant. For example, Wi-Fi 6 was 36% faster in the Living room than Wi-Fi 5 and 312% faster than Wi-Fi 4. In the Kitchen, the room with the weakest signal, Wi-Fi 6 was 29% faster than Wi-Fi 5 and 82% faster than Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Download speed on Wi-Fi

When we measured the upload speed, Wi-Fi 6 remained the speed champion in all rooms.

TP-Link Archer AX10 - Upload speed on Wi-Fi

Our comparison shows that Wi-Fi 6 offers significant speed improvements, even when buying a more affordable router, like TP-Link Archer AX10. There’s no need to invest a lot of money to benefit from Wi-Fi 6 and what it has to offer.

TP-Link Archer AX50: Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 4

TP-Link Archer AX50 is a model that can use Wi-Fi 6 on both bands: 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. On this router, we made the same tests as earlier, but we grouped them differently: Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 4 on the 2.4 GHz band and Wi-Fi 6 vs. Wi-Fi 5 on the 5 GHz band. The results we measured are more balanced between Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 6 because they use the same wireless band this time.

We first analyzed the 2.4 GHz band and compared the speeds offered by Archer AX50 using the Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 6 standards. The download speed reached on Wi-Fi 6 in the Living room (the room with the highest speeds in general) was 161.31 Mbps - 48% higher than when using Wi-Fi 4. In the graphic below, you also see the differences that we measured in the other rooms. It is easily noticeable that Wi-Fi 6 was constantly faster than Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Download speed in SpeedTest

The same happened with the upload speeds we measured in SpeedTest. There were some significant differences. For example, in the Living room, Wi-Fi 6 was 106% faster than Wi-Fi 4.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Upload speed in SpeedTest

We measured the average speed for network transfers on the 2.4 GHz band with the PassMark Performance test. In this test, the differences were smaller than in SpeedTest, but even here, Wi-Fi 6 managed to be significantly faster than Wi-Fi 4 in all rooms.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Download speed on Wi-Fi

When looking at the upload speed, the differences were more minor between the two standards, but Wi-Fi 6 still won.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Upload speed on Wi-Fi

As you could see for yourself, the Wi-Fi 6 standard offered significantly improvements in speed compared to Wi-Fi 4 on the 2.4 GHz band. Sometimes, the differences rose to 106% in favor of Wi-Fi 6.

In the Living room, with SpeedTest, the download speed offered by Archer AX50 through the Wi-Fi 6 standard was 30% higher than through Wi-Fi 5. In the Big bedroom, the room separated from the router by one wall, the difference was 65% in favor of Wi-Fi 6.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Download speed in SpeedTest

When measuring the upload speed, the situation was more balanced between the two standards, but Wi-Fi 6 was still the winner.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Upload speed in SpeedTest

PassMark Performance test has shown significant differences in all rooms when it comes to the average download speed through the wireless network. In the Living room, the Wi-Fi 6 standard was 15% faster than Wi-Fi 5, while in the Kitchen (the room where most routers have difficulties), Wi-Fi 6 was 38.7% faster than Wi-Fi 5.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Download speed on Wi-Fi

When measuring the average upload speed, Wi-Fi 6 was the clear winner. For example, in the Living room, the upload speed was 24% faster through Wi-Fi 6 than through Wi-Fi 5.

TP-Link Archer AX50 - Upload speed on Wi-Fi

On the 5 GHz band, Wi-Fi 6 was the winning standard, and it sometimes outperformed Wi-Fi 5 with differences of up to 65%.

Which TP-Link Archer router with Wi-Fi 6 you prefer?

As you can see, there are significant differences in speed when looking at new TP-Link Archer routers with Wi-Fi 6. The new models have reasonable prices that many people can afford. They also pack updated hardware, which meets the needs of a modern home network, in which online gaming, Full HD video conferencing, and video streaming in 4K resolutions are the norm. Even an affordable model like TP-Link Archer AX10 has a three-core Broadcom processor, running at 1.5 GHz, that can manage a significant number of networked devices. If you want to see how the routers we mentioned are priced, take a look on Amazon: TP-Link Archer AX10, TP-Link Archer AX50, and TP-Link Archer AX6000, Also, before closing, let us know what you think about our analysis and the speeds we reached, and tell us which Wi-Fi 6 router you prefer.

Related posts

• Hvordan aktiverer eller deaktiverer jeg Wi-Fi på Windows 11? -

• TP-Link Archer AX20 anmeldelse: Omdefinerer værdi for pengene? -

• TP-Link Archer AX10 (AX1500) anmeldelse - Overkommelig Wi-Fi 6 for alle!

• Sådan opsætter du TP-Link OneMesh Wi-Fi 6-routere og rækkeviddeforlængere

• Hvad er et mesh Wi-Fi-netværk? Hvad er mesh Wi-Fi-system?

• TP-Link Archer AX6000 anmeldelse: Frigør potentialet i Wi-Fi 6!

• TP-Link RE500X anmeldelse: Udvidelse af Wi-Fi 6-netværk -

• Gennemgå TP-Link Deco M5 v2: Et smukt WiFi-system til hele hjemmet!

• Wi-Fi 6 er et økosystem, ikke bare en router -

• TP-Link Archer T2U Plus anmeldelse: Den overkommelige USB WiFi-adapter!

• ASUS mesh Wi-Fi: Det bedste fra to verdener!

• Sådan laver du et Windows 11-hotspot -

• ASUS RT-AX92U anmeldelse: det første AiMesh WiFi-system med Wi-Fi 6!

• Gennemgå ASUS RT-AX68U: En klassiker nydesignet til Wi-Fi 6! -

• 2 måder at opdatere firmwaren på en TP-Link Wi-Fi 6 router -

• Sådan vælger du en ASUS trådløs router til dit hjem

• Sådan aktiverer du IPv6 på din TP-Link Wi-Fi 6-router -

• ASUS TUF-AX5400 anmeldelse: en Wi-Fi 6-router til gamere! -

• Konfigurer det Wi-Fi, der udsendes af din TP-Link Wi-Fi 6-router, som en Pro

• Hvad er WPS? Hvor er WPS-knappen på en router?